Ontario Premier Faces Backlash Over $21m Government Jet Purchase
Doug Ford is facing criticism after his administration approved the purchase of a C$28.9 million ($21 million) private jet, a move opponents say is poorly timed given current economic pressures on residents.
The aircraft – a Bombardier Challenger 650 manufactured in 2016 – will be used for official government travel. According to Ford’s office, it is intended to support both domestic trips across Ontario and international engagements, including visits to the United States to advocate against tariffs introduced under Donald Trump.
News of the acquisition has sparked sharp reactions from political rivals. Marit Stiles criticised the decision, arguing that many residents are struggling with the rising cost of living and that the purchase appears disconnected from everyday realities. She suggested the premier should rely on commercial flights instead.
Advocacy groups have also weighed in, with the Canadian Taxpayers Federation urging the government to reverse the decision and prioritise more cost-effective travel options.
In response, Ford’s office defended the purchase, stating that the jet will be used strictly for government business. Officials added that owning the aircraft would allow for more flexible, secure, and efficient travel across Ontario – a province they noted is geographically vast.
The government also pointed to other aviation expenditures to justify the cost, including a significantly larger investment by Quebec in similar aircraft and a federal purchase of multiple jets for official and military use.
This is not the first time such a purchase has stirred controversy in Ontario. A similar backlash occurred in the early 1980s when then-premier Bill Davis acquired a government jet, eventually leading to its sale after public pressure.
Ford, who has been in office since 2018 and recently secured a third consecutive majority, has maintained a visible presence in US policy discussions, particularly around trade issues. However, critics argue that this latest decision could further impact public perception amid already modest approval ratings.
